3rd party email, just remove port 25 to stop smtp auth failures?
Posted: 19 Jun 2015, 07:11
Hello
I am getting many email notifications of smtpauth failures, eg:
Failures: 2 (smtpauth)
Interval: 300 seconds
Blocked: Permanent Block
Log entries:
2015-06-19 00:25:38 fixed_plain authenticator failed for (Admin-PC) [27.2.xxx.xxx]:52144: 535 Incorrect authentication data (set_id=somename)
2015-06-19 00:25:39 fixed_login authenticator failed for (Admin-PC) [27.2.xxx.xxx]:52144: 535 Incorrect authentication data (set_id=somename)
My server is set so that users can use web email, however it's run via a 3rd party (everyone dot net) and the mx/cname records on my server are set to them.
My server does send outgoing emails via scripts.
Therefore am I correct to assume no user needs to authenticate to my server for email and by that logic, port 25 in TCP_IN could be removed?
Further, I assume SMTPAUTH_RESTRICT needs no setting as removing port 25 from TCP_IN is all that is required in my situation?
In my circumstances, is it really that simple or am I missing something?
I am getting many email notifications of smtpauth failures, eg:
Failures: 2 (smtpauth)
Interval: 300 seconds
Blocked: Permanent Block
Log entries:
2015-06-19 00:25:38 fixed_plain authenticator failed for (Admin-PC) [27.2.xxx.xxx]:52144: 535 Incorrect authentication data (set_id=somename)
2015-06-19 00:25:39 fixed_login authenticator failed for (Admin-PC) [27.2.xxx.xxx]:52144: 535 Incorrect authentication data (set_id=somename)
My server is set so that users can use web email, however it's run via a 3rd party (everyone dot net) and the mx/cname records on my server are set to them.
My server does send outgoing emails via scripts.
Therefore am I correct to assume no user needs to authenticate to my server for email and by that logic, port 25 in TCP_IN could be removed?
Further, I assume SMTPAUTH_RESTRICT needs no setting as removing port 25 from TCP_IN is all that is required in my situation?
In my circumstances, is it really that simple or am I missing something?