Search found 5 matches
- 06 Jan 2017, 00:30
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: 0.0.0.0 Block
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2365
Re: 0.0.0.0 Block
Seems like there are several unanswered posts, perhaps someone can shed some light on 0.0.0.0 blocks? http://forum.configserver.com/viewtopic.php?t=6966 http://forum.configserver.com/viewtopic.php?t=8167 http://forum.configserver.com/viewtopic.php?t=7461 http://forum.configserver.com/viewtopic.php?t...
- 05 Jan 2017, 19:05
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: 0.0.0.0 Block
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2365
0.0.0.0 Block
Hello, We have been recently getting alerts for "0.0.0.0 (-/-/-) blocked with too many connections". This appears to be triggered by our CT_LIMIT=500 setting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.0.0.0 suggests 0.0.0.0 is a meta IP for all system IP addresses, however, why would CSF block it's ...
- 16 Oct 2014, 22:47
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: Global Remote Files Option Error Handeling
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3835
Re: Global Remote Files Option Error Handeling
Interesting. We will double check to see if a 200 was issued and we may need to add some better error handling and possibly 404 in the event of issue or page rendering issue. Thank you for this confirmation.
- 13 Oct 2014, 16:23
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: Global Remote Files Option Error Handeling
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3835
Global Remote Files Option Error Handeling
Hello, We have run into an issue and I wanted to take the time to suggest this feature as this will help us and possibly other in the future: We have Global Whitelist file on a remote http server and we love the feature to be able to import a GLOBAL_ALLOW, GLOBAL_DENY, and GLOBAL_IGNORE. The issue w...
- 04 Apr 2013, 23:25
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: csfpre rules is remove by csf or lfd
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6561
Re: csfpre rules is remove by csf or lfd
Hello,
We rely on use NAT iptables using SNAT. We are evaluating use in production environment but are concerned with this post. Any feedback if any updates have solved this issue. Thanks!
We rely on use NAT iptables using SNAT. We are evaluating use in production environment but are concerned with this post. Any feedback if any updates have solved this issue. Thanks!