Search found 6 matches
- 15 Aug 2012, 14:58
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: c s f -d does not check the csf.ignore
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8537
- 07 Aug 2012, 08:32
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: c s f -d does not check the csf.ignore
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8537
c s f -d does not check the csf.ignore
We use csf+lfd and the Directadmin Bruteforce detector. when the da bruteforce detector "detects" it runs this command c s f -d $ip Added by DA BruteForce monitor we noticed that with this method the c s f . p l does not check the csf.ignore but only the csf.allow as the bruteforce detecto...
- 04 Mar 2012, 23:48
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9625
Re: seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
Thanks, really appriciated, we will incorporate it in the default configschirpy wrote:We've added the LF_BOGON_SKIP option to cater for the bogon issue.
Soul!
ps: other people plese vote for the interface naming option in the csf.allow
<3
- 18 Feb 2012, 08:31
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9625
Re: seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
We'll look at adding an option to exclude specific NICs from the BOGON list option as this does make sense. Thank you for considering. However, we're not looking at having separate csf configurations for different NICs at this time. as extra suggestion: If the normal config would be used together w...
- 26 Jan 2012, 11:57
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9625
Re: seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
but to disable a feature per nic is really needed if you have multiple interfaces for instance in the csf.allow when i allow IN for a certain protocol then it is allowed on all interfaces in many situation this is not desirable, i want to enable a service on 1 interface. in the readme we saw you can...
- 24 Jan 2012, 08:59
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9625
seperate interface naming and bogon exlusion
dear all, We really like csf, but in my humble opinion i do miss the definition of interfaces in csf. as a hoster we also use internal network link with a 10.0.0.0/8 range for internal backups so we need to disable bogon network completely enabling this on the public facing interfaces is preferred. ...