I'm running CSF on a VPS running CloudLinux 8.7 / DirectAdmin 1.647 / OpenLiteSpeed 1.7.16 / csf v14.17.
For directadmin with openlitespeed you'll have to use V3.
Search found 12 matches
- 17 Mar 2023, 10:48
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: Do MESSENGER still work?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1272
- 11 Nov 2021, 11:57
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: Disable Apache status check?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2239
Disable Apache status check?
Is there a way to skip the Apache status check in LFD altogether?
I tried setting:
but lfd log keeps showing
I tried setting:
Code: Select all
PT_APACHESTATUS = ""
lfd: STATS: Unable to retrieve Apache Server Status [?auto] - Unable to download: Cannot parse URL: '?auto'
- 10 Sep 2020, 14:53
- Forum: General Discussion (cxs)
- Topic: Scanning on a non-existent file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 18599
Re: Scanning on a non-existent file
Seeing that these requests often come from exploit scanners, is there a way to instantly delete the uploaded file & add the offending Remote IP address to the blocklist? Instead of wasting precious server resources, analyzing a file that has no business on the server and won't be processed furth...
- 16 Dec 2019, 09:57
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: How to ignore specific email address check
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5136
Re: How to ignore specific email address check
Bumping this question, as I have the same situation. Is there any way to have LFD ignore specific Email addresses triggering an IP block? I tried expanding the Logignore file, but apparently this doesn't have any effect? ... ^(\S+|\S+\s+\d+\s+\S+) [^\s\.]+ dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth fa...
- 05 Apr 2018, 08:37
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: lfd.service: main process exited
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11821
Re: lfd.service: main process exited
Same issue here, cPanel is able to restart the service, but I'm curious why it gets killed in the first place.
Looks like I have too many IP blocks (iptables busy waiting), and the csf.error mentions I should use IPSET. Guess that will be the solution.
Looks like I have too many IP blocks (iptables busy waiting), and the csf.error mentions I should use IPSET. Guess that will be the solution.
- 06 Dec 2016, 11:22
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: LFD should use resident memory instead of virtual memory
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7284
Re: LFD should use resident memory instead of virtual memory
I vote +1 on the PT_USERMEM_RSS feature request as people tend to just put (php) processes on the ignore list to "get rid of the emails". Reports that PHP scripts are infact using too much *resident* memory are much more helpful than reporting 'high' Virtual Memory. I would change my lfd s...
- 16 Jun 2016, 08:38
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: Advanced port+ip filtering
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6283
Re: Advanced port+ip filtering
No word on automatically having only *ports* blocked for IP addresses? I tried via commandline: But that doesn't seem to have proper effect. I do not want to go the TEMP DENY route, as those blocks are lifted on csf restart:
Code: Select all
csf -d d=22|s=X.X.X.X
Code: Select all
csf -td X.X.X.X 9999d -p 22 [comment]
- 18 May 2016, 14:59
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: Advanced port+ip filtering
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6283
Re: Advanced port+ip filtering
Bumping this as I, too, would like to know.
And additionally, is there a way to set CSF to automatically block on a port basis, rather than IP basis? Just because someone is hammering our SMTP port doesn't mean they should be denied access to our web server...
And additionally, is there a way to set CSF to automatically block on a port basis, rather than IP basis? Just because someone is hammering our SMTP port doesn't mean they should be denied access to our web server...
- 19 Feb 2016, 08:42
- Forum: Suggestions (csf)
- Topic: CSF Messenger request feature
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4530
Re: CSF Messenger request feature
I second this request, rather than opening a new feature request, I'm bumping this here. Seeing the Messenger Service is (and should remain) quite a basic application with low footprint, perhaps a workaround would be (for the HTML Messenger) to include javascript code that'll load an <IP_ADDRESS>.js...
- 04 Aug 2015, 10:27
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: x-forwarded-for headers for load balancers with dynamic ips
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4329
Re: x-forwarded-for headers for load balancers with dynamic ips
This question is somewhat related to one from dec 2014 . I too am looking for a way to further check the X-Forwarded-For header's IP address, in my case especially when the Remote_Addr's IP address is whitelisted already. Is there any way to inspect the X-Forwarded-For header (or alternatives, like ...