Search found 4 matches
- 19 Dec 2013, 13:00
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6230
Re: IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
Hi! I did write eth0 to ETH_DEVICE just testing because of this problems... I have just emptied them and restart firewall (stop and start). root@megaserver1 /etc/csf # service csf start Starting csf:Flushing chain `INPUT' Flushing chain `FORWARD' Flushing chain `OUTPUT' Flushing chain `PREROUTING' F...
- 19 Dec 2013, 12:41
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6230
Re: IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
Hello!
Thanks!
csf.allow and csf.ignore are defaults and there is no IP included... checked. Also, if they were, they probably would appear at the reports I uploaded before, I guess...
Thanks!
csf.allow and csf.ignore are defaults and there is no IP included... checked. Also, if they were, they probably would appear at the reports I uploaded before, I guess...
- 19 Dec 2013, 12:17
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6230
Re: IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
From external: Nmap scan report for XXXXXXXX (x.x.x.x) Host is up (0.15s latency). rDNS record for x.x.x.x: xxxxxxx Not shown: 992 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 21/tcp open ftp PureFTPd 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 5.9p1 Debian 5ubuntu1.1 (protocol 2.0) 53/tcp open domain 80/tcp open http nginx...
- 19 Dec 2013, 11:58
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6230
IN PORTS restrictions does not apply at Ubuntu Server
Hello: Thanks so much for this wonderful software... I am using it at CentOS servers and I am recommending it to my IT friends... I have a problem at Ubuntu server 12.04. Configured CSF without problems... I have not included any IP at allow/ignore lists yet. The problem is the IN port configuration...